FDPIC · decision ·
Bodycams on public transport: the FDPIC prohibits BLT from processing
By Advisorn · guidance, not advice
In brief
The FDPIC has prohibited Baselland Transport AG from using bodycams that recorded images and voices of passengers and staff, because no law provides for them clearly enough. The company must delete the data collected.
What happened
In addition to fixed cameras, BLT had its staff wear cameras that recorded images and sound. The FDPIC opened an investigation in February 2026 and closed it with a decision of 29 September 2026.
The FDPIC recognises the interest in protecting passengers and staff, but considers that weighing it against such a serious intrusion is for the legislature, not for individual transport companies. Neither the Passenger Transport Act nor any other federal law provides a sufficient basis.
What it means for an SME
The decision concerns a company holding a licence for a public task, which needs a legal basis. A private company, by contrast, can justify video surveillance with an overriding interest, provided it is proportionate and people are informed.
The message applies to everyone: recording people is a serious intrusion. Before introducing cameras, and even more so body-worn cameras or cameras with sound, consider whether a less intrusive measure exists and document the choice.
Source: FDPIC communication of 1 October 2026. General information summarised from the source, not advice on your case: for your case, the text of the decision or the law is what counts.